In our Oslo to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 100 minutes, completing the 1772km route in 19h 9min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 9min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~276 kWh
- Distance: 1772km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 9min |
20h 49min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Erhvervspark (10 min, 23% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund West (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
XXXLutz Mann Mobilia (10 min, 14% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Burger King (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Garlstorfer Wald West (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Hannover-Wülferode West (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kauf Park (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Reinhardshain Nord (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Hornbach (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Renchtal West (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 12:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1772km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~276 kWh vs ~282 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons