In our Oslo to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 9 minutes, completing the 1468km route in 16h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 37min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1468km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 37min |
16h 46min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~264 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Sannarp (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Allego Erhvervspark (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Ostetal Nord (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
P+R Beisenbusch (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Autohof Vechta (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
toom Baumarkt (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 9-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1468km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~240 kWh vs ~270 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons