In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 640 minutes, completing the 998km route in 21h 18min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 18min (640 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~155 kWh
- Distance: 998km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 18min |
31h 58min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (21 min, 15% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Kuršu krogs (22 min, 10% → 30%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger ABC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Järve (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 640-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 998km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~155 kWh vs ~159 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons