In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 23 minutes, completing the 1427km route in 31h 58min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 31h 58min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 58min
- Energy: ~227 kWh
- Distance: 1427km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
32h 21min |
31h 58min |
| Charging time: |
2h 19min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~257 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (13 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (19 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (29 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
K-Supermarket Mankkaa (11 min, 16% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Pääsküla (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste (10 min, 18% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger ABC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Järve (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 23-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1427km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 58min vs 2h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~227 kWh vs ~242 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons