In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 32 minutes, completing the 1409km route in 31h 47min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 31h 47min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~224 kWh
- Distance: 1409km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
32h 19min |
31h 47min |
| Charging time: |
2h 31min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~254 kWh |
~252 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Krooning (16 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
K-Supermarket Mankkaa (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 3:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (10 min, 13% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (24 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (37 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
IKEA (12 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Preem Grums (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 25% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
K-Supermarket Mankkaa (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Ykkös Cafe (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 32-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1409km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 2h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~224 kWh vs ~239 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons