In our Oslo to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 57 minutes, completing the 1256km route in 24h 47min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 47min (57 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~195 kWh
- Distance: 1256km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 47min |
25h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
2h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~226 kWh |
~321 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (17 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Virsi (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 3:
Kuršu krogs (28 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Björkäng Vägkrog (11 min, 17% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Rügencenter (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Nowokarsiborska (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
OTO Park Handlowy (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka (36 min, 15% → 86%)
-
Stop 9:
Vilniaus (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Restoranas Siesta (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 57-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1256km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 2h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~195 kWh vs ~200 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons