In our Oslo to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 2014km route in 23h 5min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 5min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2014km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 5min |
23h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~363 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Trieben (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Tankstelle Bergler (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2014km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~370 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons