In our Paris to Nice EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 46 minutes, completing the 931km route in 8h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 59min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~145 kWh
- Distance: 931km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 59min |
9h 45min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~168 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Roussillon, Roussillon (10 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Nice
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mobilize Lounge Avia, Créancey (15 min, 17% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire des Chères Ouest, Les Cheres (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de La Coucourde, La Coucourde (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (15 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 931km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~145 kWh vs ~147 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons