In our Prague to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1322km route in 16h 39min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 39min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~216 kWh
- Distance: 1322km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 39min |
16h 49min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
45min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~238 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (16 min, 12% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
A.T.U (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1322km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~216 kWh vs ~243 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons