In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 1284km route in 13h 56min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 56min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 40min
- Energy: ~204 kWh
- Distance: 1284km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 13min |
13h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 55min |
1h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telis Finanz (12 min, 15% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Mies-van-der-Rohe-Straße (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle Brennersee (15 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Eni Paganella Ovest (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Electra Old Wild West (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Cantagallo Ovest (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (12 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Giove Ovest (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telis Finanz (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (14 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hofer (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Eni Paganella Ovest (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Mantova Village (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1284km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 40min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~204 kWh vs ~218 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons