In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 28 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~303 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 38min |
22h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~351 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (10 min, 59% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Autohof Brück (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
dm-drogerie markt (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Schwabach West (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~303 kWh vs ~358 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons