In our Rome to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 73 minutes, completing the 1223km route in 23h 14min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 14min (73 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~190 kWh
- Distance: 1223km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
23h 14min |
24h 27min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~220 kWh |
~221 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Polizia Locale (14 min, 25% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Xenos (37 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Sklavenitis Supermarket (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ROA (10 min, 42% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Ewiva McGallon (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Q8 easy Via Appia (44 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 4:
Xenos (13 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
DEI Blue Kapsiochas (22 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Epirus Plaza (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Elpefuture SEA Vélou pros Athína (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 73-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1223km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 2h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~190 kWh vs ~194 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons