In our Rome to Milan EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 2372 minutes, completing the 579km route in 5h 45min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 5h 45min (2372 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~101 kWh
- Distance: 579km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
45h 17min |
5h 45min |
| Charging time: |
39h 7min |
25min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~104 kWh |
~104 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Centro Commerciale La Palma, Caldare (258 min, 20% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Fabro Est, Fabro (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Badia al Pino Est, Civitella In Val di Chiana (154 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Est, San Giovanni Valdarno (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 5:
Via del Lago, Barberino di Mugello (281 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Cantagallo Est, Casalecchio di Reno (204 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Secchia Est, Modena (322 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
Atto Primo, Fidenza (362 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
San Zenone Est, San Zenone al Lambro (122 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (10 min, 26% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est, Casalecchio di Reno (15 min, 24% → 72%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 2372-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 579km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 39h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~101 kWh vs ~187 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons