In our Rome to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 70 minutes, completing the 1301km route in 12h 41min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 41min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1301km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 41min |
13h 51min |
| Charging time: |
36min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~234 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 13% → 71%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (13 min, 27% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Campogalliano Est (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Paganella Est (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofer (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Restaurant Gut Rettenberg am Golfplatz (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
ALDI Süd (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Kladruby jih (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1301km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~205 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons