In our Vilnius to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1912km route in 19h 25min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 25min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~312 kWh
- Distance: 1912km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 25min |
19h 39min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~344 kWh |
~342 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Na Półboru (13 min, 21% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
dm-drogerie markt (15 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (14 min, 33% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Schnellladepark (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1912km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~312 kWh vs ~351 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons