In our Lisbon to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 16 minutes, completing the 1989km route in 20h 21min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 21min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~325 kWh
- Distance: 1989km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 21min |
20h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~358 kWh |
~360 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto (14 min, 19% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Est (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Super U (18 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de la Loire (19 min, 10% → 78%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 24% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Super U (24 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de la Loire (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aire de Lyon-Dagneux (10 min, 35% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1989km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~325 kWh vs ~365 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons