In our Paris to Munich EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3550 minutes, completing the 827km route in 8h 13min. The key advantage? 12 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 8h 13min (3550 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~144 kWh
- Distance: 827km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
67h 23min |
8h 13min |
| Charging time: |
58h 42min |
32min |
| Charging stops: |
15 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Ussy-sur-Marne (231 min, 35% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Vrigny (362 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (263 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (208 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat (254 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold Sud (199 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Brumath Ouest (263 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Best Western Hotel (63 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 10:
CAP Markt (49 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 11:
Freibad (258 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 12:
Sindelfinger Wald (326 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 13:
Burger King (326 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 14:
Sortimo Innovationspark (358 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 15:
eni Tankstelle Verdistraße (49 min, 10% → 21%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 18% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (10 min, 11% → 35%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 3550-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 827km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 58h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~144 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons