In our Prague to Bern EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 770km route in 8h 16min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 16min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~122 kWh
- Distance: 770km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 26min |
8h 16min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
48min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~139 kWh |
~138 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Oberpfälzer Alb Nord (14 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
BFS Business Fleet Services (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Sindelfinger Wald (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
MediaMarkt (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Birrhard (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Oberpfälzer Alb Nord (10 min, 26% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Sindelfinger Wald (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 770km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~122 kWh vs ~130 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons