In our Prague to Budapest EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 8 minutes, completing the 529km route in 5h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 9min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~84 kWh
- Distance: 529km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 17min |
5h 9min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~95 kWh |
~95 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava, Velké Němčice (10 min, 27% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač, Bratislava (10 min, 18% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Bábolna, Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava, Ladná (11 min, 23% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr, Ikrény (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 529km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~84 kWh vs ~90 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons