In our Rome to Munich EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3919 minutes, completing the 902km route in 9h 15min. The key advantage? 11 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 9h 15min (3919 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 902km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
74h 34min |
9h 15min |
| Charging time: |
64h 38min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Centro Commerciale La Palma (258 min, 20% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Fabro Est (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Badia al Pino Est (154 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Est (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 5:
Via del Lago (281 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Cantagallo Est (204 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Secchia Est (240 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
Enel Mantova Village (290 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 9:
Affi Lago di Garda Sud (226 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Nogaredo Est (362 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 11:
NOI Techpark Alto Adige (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 12:
Hotel Zum Engel (340 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 13:
Destination Charger Krumers Alpin Resort (294 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 14:
Polarstern Ladestation - Sport Conrad (254 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (18 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (10 min, 11% → 36%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 3919-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 902km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 64h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~157 kWh vs ~291 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons